Peasant Struggles in India
A large number of peasants, tribesmen, disinherited landlords and disbanded
soldiers turned to part time or full time banditry in 18 century and 19 the
century when they were deprived of their livelihood, evicted from their
homelands or squeezed in their tribal territories.
The thugee were the most colorful and numerous of Indian bandits, the
best of them combining a rather distant millenarian prospect with
gallantry and a genius for swift assassination. They arose about 1650 in
the area between Delhi and Agra and multiplied in late Mughal times as
revenue exactions became harsher. During British rule they spread
throughout Bihar and into Oudh, Bengal, Orissa, Rajputana, Punjab,
Mysore and Karnataka.Thugee were recruited from outlaws of the state,
peasants and disbanded soldiers chiefly from the most oppressed classes
of their regions. They confined their assaults chiefly to merchants,
soldiers, money carriers and servants of the company.
The militant religious movements strove for the liberation of an ethnic
region both from the British and from foreign Indian predators and
invaders and for the establishment of a divinely ordained kingdom
righteousness and justice. They arose among severely exploited
minorities most of whom remained in there home territories and were
numerically preponderant within a region. Many bandit movements
resembled the ethnic religious movements in possessing special religious
cults charismatic leaders and a belief that their struggles would
eventually release the world from pain. Bandits apparently differed from
local religious movements for liberation, however being recruited from
displaced or outcaste groups and individuals.
14 of the revolts were mass insurrections in which peasants provided the
leadership and were the sole or dominant force. These revolts were
sudden and dramatic. They lacked a religious movement ideology and a
single charismatic leader. They aimed initially at the redress of
particular grievances and thus were at first reformative.
All the uprisings involved tenants and small owner-cultivators. All were
against economic deprivations resulting from British policies and in
most cases also from landlords. The revolt in Rangpur and Dinajpur of
1783 and the Deccan peasant uprising of 1875 provide earlier and later
example of features characteristic of all these uprising. Water
carriers, barbers and even the house servants of moneylenders in
addition to cultivators joined the Deccan revolt of 1875. It covered
Poona and Ahmed nagar districts and spread into Gujarat. Excessive
revenue exactions, low prices of grain and cotton crops and eviction and
land mortgages to moneylenders drove the peasants to three-week
insurrections. Tens of 1000s met in public gatherings in market places
and vowed to boycott the claims of moneylenders and to seize their
documents. Some moneylenders fled the area. Those who resisted the armed
bands had their fodder stacks burned down although the peasants carried
on very little personal violence. The revolt produced some respite in
the Deccan Agriculturists Relief Act of 1879.
The famous Bengal Indigo Strike of 1860 was the first large strike in
India and one of the most successful. It illustrates the initiative and
discipline of what peasants are capable of .The tenants were forced to
grow indigo at very low prices for the British textile industry to the
exclusion of other crops. When they refused slave drivers –some
trained on US southern plantations kidnapped or flogged them, exposed
them in stocks or murdered them. The strike spread rapidly. Tenants
assembled with swords, bows and arrows and matchlocks to defend their
settlements. In Pabna an army of 2000 peasants appeared and wounded a
magistrate's horse otherwise there was little violence. The strike
stopped indigo planting in Bengal and forced the planters to move west
to Bihar.
Santhal Uprising against British as well as Zamindars who were invested with
unjustified and undreamt of powers of ownership of land that peasants had
customarily considered and cultivated for millennium as their own and also
against money lenders who were given powers to get peasants imprisoned for
failure to repay their debts and against the authority of officials. The
Santhals never thought that they could be evicted from their ancestral
homesteads; holdings and forests to failure to pay taxes and debts but that had
come to happen. The peasants bonded themselves to resist short measures, illegal
cesses and forced deliveries of agreement to pay enhanced rents and also there
had been combination of raiyats in east Bengal refused to payments except what
they considered just. The Santhals found their leaders in two brothers who
claimed to have received some occult blessings from the Gods to put an end to
oppression of officers and to the deceit of merchants.
With equal fury and fervor rose the Maratha peasants in the same generation
against the oppression of money lenders.They could not brook the idea of
obedience to the new laws which gave such coercive powers to money lenders that
any money lender could with impunity move court to imprison anyone of his
peasant debtors so they revolted burnt the houses,killed many oppressors and
attacked government officials who were supporting their oppressors.
Indian peasants have a long tradition of armed uprisings reaching back at least
to the initial British conquest and the last decades of Moghul government. For
more than 200 years peasants in all the major regions have repeatedly risen
against landlords, revenue agents and other bureaucrats, moneylenders, police
and military forces. The uprisings were in response to relative deprivation of
unusually severe character always economic and often also involving physical
brutality or ethnic persecution.
Although revolts have been widespread, certain areas have an especially strong
tradition of rebellion. Bengal has been a hotbed of revolt both rural and urban
from the earliest days of British rule. Some districts in particular Mymensingh,
Dinajpur, Rangpur and Pabna in West Bengal and Santhal regions of Bihar and West
Bengal figured repeatedly in peasant struggles and continued to do so.The tribal
areas of Andhra Pradesh and the state of Kerala also have long traditions in
revolt. Hill regions were tribal or other minorities retain a certain
independence, ethnic unity and tactical maneuverability and where the terrain is
suited to guerilla welfare are of course especially favorable for peasant
struggle but these have also occurred in densely populated, plain regions such
as Thanjavur where land hunger, landless labor and unemployment caused great
suffering.
The British ushered in a qualitatively new set of property relations by making
land a commodity thereby giving a mortal blow to the peculiar feudal relations
prevailing in the countryside. These new types of proprietary relations are
called the Zamindari and ryotwari systems. Under the former vast tracts of land
comprising of districts, talukas, villages and even large tribal areas were made
over to zamindars.